The analogue/digital pair is a familiar binary. The former is a correspondence, something continuous and unique, adept and ever-changing. No surprise that here vaguity may flourish; as at the other end, subject to its orthodoxy, the digital cements a level of description in which nuance translates to one and zero. And as the honest observer would believe, the digital will govern in exact accordance with its laws – no colour and no deviation. And in a certain sense this is true. See the digital consists of those little numbers that need no colour. Black and white is all. Teachers are chalking it up on the blackboard; the boffin drools at it – and there you are, sitting here, asking me about coherence. Just know that our best chance at coherence, or some universal understanding, comes through binary and no middle child. It should be the letter in black, and its edge the opposite. This way language can be made easier for us. None of the confusion, but a streamlining of meaning and the polish to interpretation. Language would make sense; information as opposed to signification – we may not know how to read the numbers, but something will, and it will tell us, some way or another it will. This way all those pitfalls of nuance can be filled in towards a new kind of rational code. A refers to B, and sentences are just pattern: of word, letter and pixel. The pixels can be arranged, and the letters can fall together.